Send an Email to Congressman Tim Bishop

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL

United States Congress
Attn: Congressman Tim Bishop
225 Cannon H.O.B.
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman Tim Bishop,

I am writing on behalf of surfers all over the world to express our dismay regarding the Army Corps of Engineer’s plans to fortify the Montauk Lighthouse with another large stone revetment. Fighting coastal erosion through shoreline armoring can have many deleterious impacts to the coast. Shoreline armoring has failed repeatedly at this location, may increase erosion problems in the surrounding areas and will significantly alter a regionally classic wave.

The Surfrider Foundation has presented a permanent solution to the erosion problem by suggesting to move the lighthouse back from the existing shoreline. Other lighthouses have been successfully moved back in the area and no longer deal with erosion problems. Although this option is more expensive up front, it is a far better economical option in the long term. The Army Corps proposal to dump 12.6-ton boulders wrapping 840 feet around the Point, is not only a very expensive project, but also only a temporary fix. The proposed revetment will not only impair a recreational zone, disrupt the natural flow of sand, and impact the marine ecosystem, but it will become an eyesore for thousands of tourists that enjoy the natural beauty of the point. All of this for a project that only temporarily fixes the problem.

In addition, the surf spots in the vicinity have been popular recreational sites for decades, enjoyed by local athletes and traveling surfers alike. Montauk Point is also a very popular surfcasting site, visited by fishermen from across the State. Construction of the proposed stone revetment will disrupt this sport for at least two seasons. The recreational benefit of Montauk Point and its economic benefit to the local economy should not be underestimated. Montauk Point also has an immeasurable positive effect on the health and happiness of the citizens who live nearby.

Like much of the Eastern seaboard, the coastline in this area is under a natural geologic process of retreat. Coastal erosion is inevitable. By adopting plans that consider long-term sustainability, millions of dollars can be saved as well as the natural environment. Moving the Montauk Lighthouse is a better use of taxpayer money and sets a good national example as coastal communities make difficult choices to protect property and our public beaches in the face of global warming-induced sea level rise. It will also ensure that the lighthouse is safe from erosion for centuries to come.

Montauk Point is a coastal gem where the forces of nature have created a beautiful coastline that attracts visitors, fishermen, surfers and people worldwide who love the beautiful and largely natural setting. Adding yet another intensive and over-engineered protection effort will detract from the natural value of this special place. For all the reasons stated above, we strongly urge you to consider alternatives to the proposed armament project.

Very Truly Yours,

Name
Occupation
City, State, Country

Note: Required fields are indicated by a red asterisk.
Worried about how we use your information? View our privacy policy. If you would like to have all your petition fields auto-filled for you, please take a moment to register with us. It's quick and free!

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* Address:
Address Line 2:
* City:
* State/Province/Region:
* Country:	Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Anguilla Antigua Barbuda Argentina Aruba Australia Austria Azores Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bolivia Bonaire Bosnia Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Canary Islands Cape Verde Islands Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Channel Islands Chile China Colombia Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Curacao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Equitorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Holland Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosrae Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Madeira Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Moldova Monaco Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norfolk Island Northern Ireland Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Ponape Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of Ireland Republic of Yemen Reunion Romania Rota Russia Rwanda Saba Saipan Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka St. Barthelemy St. Christopher St. Croix St. Eustatius St. John St. Kitts Nevis St. Lucia St. Maarten St. Martin St. Thomas St. Vincent the Grenadines Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tahiti Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Tinian Togo Tonga Tortola Trinidad Tobago Truk Tunisia Turkey Turks Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine Union Island United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay US Virgin Islands Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Gorda Wake Island Wales Wallis Futuna Islands Western Samoa Yap Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe
Postal Code:
* Email Address:
* Occupation:
Additional Comments:
	Please enter the case-sensitive text you see below into the verification box before pressing submit.
* Verification: